TheaterForge LLC

Multi-domain simulation
and tactical visualization.

Deterministic multi-domain simulation and trade study software — and the reproducible environment AI/ML needs to be trained and tested against. Browser-native, offline by default, and reproducible by construction.

Overview

TheaterForge is a research and development firm focused on making complex multi-domain analysis available on the hardware analysts already have, inside software environments they are already permitted to run.

Our engine performs trajectory modeling, telemetry parsing, and orbital computation entirely within a standard browser runtime. Analysis executes locally on the client machine. No mission data is transmitted to an external server, and no installation is required.

Core Competencies

Multi-Domain Visualization

Space, air, maritime, and ground layers rendered against a single synchronized timeline and common measurement framework.

Deterministic Simulation Modeling

Reproducible, auditable simulation runs suitable for comparative analysis and methodology review.

Trajectory & Orbital Propagation

Perturbation-aware orbital propagation with a characterized and documented accuracy envelope.

Trade-Space Screening

Rapid screening across large option sets to narrow the field before committing high-fidelity modeling resources.

AI/ML Training & Evaluation Environments · planned

The engine designed to be wrapped as a Gym-compatible reinforcement-learning environment: agents would act at decision points such as sensor tasking, and would be trained across the trade space and scored against doctrine on identical, reproducible terms.

Analyst-Facing Decision Support

3D geospatial and 2D tactical visualization, scenario authoring, and self-contained exportable reporting.

Deployment Model

ANALYST WORKSTATION STANDARD BROWSER Simulation · Analysis Visualization Everything executes here. no mission data External network and cloud services

There is no server component and no installation. The engine executes inside a standard browser on the machine the analyst already has, and mission data has nowhere to go.

Findings

Four results from committed, hashed artefacts. Each figure states its own limits.

Factor dominance: operator decision delay versus architecture parameters Relative effect on worst-case decision margin: operator decision delay 1.00; architecture parameter B 0.16; architecture parameter C 0.13; architecture parameter D 0.11; architecture parameter E 0.09; architecture parameter F 0.09; architecture parameter G 0.05. Operator delay exceeds every architecture parameter by about six to one. Notional model, parameter values notional, sensing models not yet validated; a result about the model, not any fielded architecture. ~6 : 1 over every architecture parameter RELATIVE EFFECT ON WORST-CASE DECISION MARGIN Operator decision delay1.00Parameter B0.16Parameter C0.13Parameter D0.11Parameter E0.09Parameter F0.09Parameter G0.05 Notional multi-orbit model. Parameter values notional; sensing models not yet validated. Result about the model, not any fielded architecture. Committed and hashed.
Screening design: 30 factors in 32 runs The committed 32-run by 30-factor two-level design matrix. Each column is one factor, each row one run; filled cells are the high level. Every column is balanced and every pair of columns is orthogonal. Resolves all 30 main effects in 32 runs; two-factor interactions are aliased by construction and the aliasing structure is reported. 30 main effects resolved in 32 runs 30 FACTORS → 32 RUNS → high level low level balanced · orthogonal Resolves all 30 main effects in 32 runs. Two-factor interactions are aliased by construction and the aliasing structure is reported.
Cross-check against NASA GMAT: access windows Satellite visibility windows over a ground point, NASA GMAT R2026a versus TheaterForge, seven days, J2-only force model. 51 of 51 windows matched; maximum boundary error 10.4 seconds on windows 209 to 823 seconds long. The first run failed on an input-convention mismatch; both runs are on the record. Residual under investigation. No component is claimed as validated. 51 / 51 windows matched 10.4 s max boundary error, on windows of 209–823 s NASA GMAT THEATERFORGE MAX Δ 1Jan 1 01:42:19.5Jan 1 01:42:24.14.9 s2Jan 1 03:21:48.3Jan 1 03:21:54.36.0 s3Jan 1 05:03:50.3Jan 1 05:03:56.66.3 s4Jan 1 06:46:31.3Jan 1 06:46:36.55.8 s5Jan 1 08:28:19.0Jan 1 08:28:22.76.4 s6Jan 1 10:09:32.9Jan 1 10:09:36.05.9 s7Jan 1 11:51:55.1Jan 1 11:51:58.74.2 s8Jan 2 00:21:43.4Jan 2 00:21:42.710.4 s Window start, UTC. Windows 1–8 of 51 shown. Cross-checked against NASA GMAT R2026a under an identical J2-only force model. The first run failed on an input-convention mismatch; both runs are on the record. Residual under investigation. No component is claimed as validated.
Windows 1 to 8 of 51, start times UTC
WindowNASA GMAT startTheaterForge startMax boundary error
12026-01-01 01:42:19.5992026-01-01 01:42:24.1744.9 s
22026-01-01 03:21:48.3262026-01-01 03:21:54.3706.0 s
32026-01-01 05:03:50.3902026-01-01 05:03:56.6976.3 s
42026-01-01 06:46:31.3992026-01-01 06:46:36.5725.8 s
52026-01-01 08:28:19.0372026-01-01 08:28:22.7866.4 s
62026-01-01 10:09:32.9552026-01-01 10:09:36.0765.9 s
72026-01-01 11:51:55.1302026-01-01 11:51:58.7024.2 s
82026-01-02 00:21:43.4622026-01-02 00:21:42.76910.4 s
Raid of eight: fully intercepted, margin collapsed Replicated across five seeds: a raid of 8 was intercepted 8 of 8 at every seed, with a worst-case margin of 1.4 seconds median, 0.2 to 3.3 seconds across seeds, against a 20 second requirement. Leak-rate requirement: PASS. Timing requirement: FAIL. Same run, in 33 of 48 configurations. Notional model, parameter values notional, models not yet validated; a result about the model, not any fielded architecture. Raid of 8, fully intercepted INTERCEPTS 8 / 8 WORST-CASE MARGIN — 5 SEEDS, VS 20 s REQUIRED 1.4 s Leak ratePASS TimingFAIL same run · 33 of 48 configs Notional layered air and missile defense model. Parameter values notional; models not yet validated. Result about the model, not any fielded architecture. Committed and hashed.

Differentiators

Company Data

Legal nameTheaterForge LLC
Entity typeLimited Liability Company (Utah), member-managed
State entity number14733139-0160
Established2 September 2026
Business sizeSmall business
Technology readinessTRL 4
Primary NAICS541715 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Additional NAICS541511 · 541512 · 541330
UEIFTQ7GVNLKDX5
CAGE code257P5
SAM.gov registrationActive
Place of performanceWest Jordan, Utah, United States

Contact

Principal
Leland Doss
Email
Telephone
Location
West Jordan, Utah
Capability statement